May/June 2022 Issue
Also in this issue: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Sign Ordinance | Court of Appeals Examines Limits on Municipal Exactions | Wisconsin Supreme Court: Board of Review Properly Classified Nudo Holdings, LLC Property
Determining WRS Reportable Earnings with Employee Separations and Settlements
Brian P. Goodman | 05.24.22
Sometimes, a municipality provides something of value to an employee in exchange for an employee’s separation from employment and the employee signing a waiver of potential claims against the municipality. This is often referred to as a separation agreement (but may have different titles). There are a variety of legal issues involved in drafting an effective and enforceable separation agreement. One area of potential confusion is how monetary payments made to employees via a separation agreement should be treated for purposes of the Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS).
A separation payment, whether a one-time lump sum or a series of payments, made at the time of separation of employment does not constitute WRS reportable earnings, and neither the employer nor the employee is permitted to make WRS contributions based on such payment. Additionally, unless the municipality has a policy of annually paying employees for their unused vacation or sick leave, paying an employee a certain amount for unused vacation or sick leave upon separation would not constitute WRS reportable earnings, and no WRS contributions should be made based on such a payment. To limit potential future disputes, a separation agreement that includes such payment should expressly state that such payment does not constitute WRS reportable earnings and that no WRS contributions will be made based on such a payment.
Note, these payments are generally taxable income to the employee, subject to regular payroll withholding, even though they are not WRS reportable earnings. This might require running a special payroll for the payment to ensure the payment is treated properly for tax and WRS purposes.
If an employee is terminated by the municipality and then is subsequently reinstated following a grievance or legal action (or following the settlement of such a claim) or if the employee settles a wage claim against the municipality, WRS treats these situations differently than payments upon an employee’s separation. Any settlement in these situations constitutes a compromise settlement. The WRS requires municipalities to submit the compromise settlement to the Department of Employee Trust Funds (ETF) for its review within 90 days of the effective date of the compromise settlement. The compromise settlement must include a breakdown of any hours and earnings and the time period the hours would have covered and the earnings paid. Following ETF’s review, ETF will invoice the municipality if a compromise settlement results in the municipality owing additional WRS contributions. Similarly, ETF will make any appropriate corrections to the employee’s account. Section 1300 of the WRS Administration Manual provides details regarding how ETF will determine which portions of any compromise settlement constitute WRS earnings. ETF will not pre-review or pre-approve draft compromise settlements.
Municipalities should work carefully with legal counsel regarding any compromise settlement to ensure that the WRS earnings and ETF reporting requirements of the compromise settlement are properly incorporated into any settlement document.
This newsletter is published and distributed for informational pur-
poses only. It does not offer legal advice with respect to particular
situations, and does not purport to be a complete treatment of
the legal issues surrounding any topic. Because your situation
may differ from those described in this Newsletter, you should
not rely solely on this information in making legal decisions.