Boardman Clark Welcomes Jennifer Johnson

Boardman Clark is proud to announce that Jennifer Johnson has joined the firm. 

Jennifer comes to Boardman Clark with a plethora of experience and will be working in the firm's Immigration and Family Law Practice Groups. In her family law practice, Jennifer represents clients in a variety of litigation and mediation cases, including divorce, child custody, child support, spousal support, and property division. In her immigration law practice, she has a strong focus on political asylums, U‑Visas, and VAWAS. 

Prior to joining Boardman Clark, Jennifer established the Non-Profit Consulting Group, wherein she collaborated with NGOs and the African Bank of Development to further social justice and human rights issues in the Middle East. Her extensive research on human trafficking abuse has given her a distinctive perspective on civil and human rights issues.

"We're very excited to welcome another experienced and well-rounded attorney to our firm," says Marta Meyers, chair of Boardman Clark's Family Law Practice Group, "Jennifer has intelligence, maturity, and enthusiasm that will really add to our capabilities in serving our clients."

Boardman Clark is one of Madison’s largest and longest-standing law firms. The firm serves individuals, businesses, school districts, and local governments. Its areas of service include litigation, franchise and dealership law, business law, taxation, estate planning and probate, intellectual property, family law, municipal law, banking, labor and employment, land use, elder services, real estate, and school law.

The Latest

Wisconsin’s Local Government Response to Hyper Scale Data Centers: An Overview

Municipal Law Newsletter | 08.25.26

Over the past two years, Wisconsin has become a focal point for hyperscale data center development. Projects associated with Microsoft, Meta, OpenAI, Oracle, Vantage, QTS, and other developers have generated billions of dollars in proposed investment and unprecedented demand for electric transmission, water infrastructure, and land development. The rapid pace and scale of these proposals has prompted responses from local governments across the state. As of yet, the responses have not led to a state-wide coordinated legislative approach, in contrast to neighboring states such as Minnesota. Instead, counties, cities, villages, and towns are experimenting with a wide range of regulatory and policy tools as they attempt to balance economic opportunity against concerns about growth, infrastructure, and local control.